CO129-324 - Governor Nathan - 1904 [10-12] — Page 36

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

35

chase money and the balance should be paid when a Lease was rooted or a Certificate of title issued defining the exact boundaries of the ground and accordingly the Purchasers, believing (as was the case) that the Vendor had shown acquired the absolute title to 200ft by 850ft of ground and desiring that completion should be delayed until the boundaries were fixed and a Government Lease or Certificate granted, paid over to the Vendor $3,500 on account of purchase money and incurred very considerable costs in the preparation of plans and legal expenses.

On the 14th July 1902 a letter was addressed by the Colonial Secretary to Messrs. Deacon & Hastings the then Solicitors for the Vendor (copy enclosed) stating that the Crown Lease to the area would be issued in due course and on the 1st of September 1908 another letter was written enclosing a tracing of the area which the Government was prepared to lease. Objections were made to some of the conditions under which the Lease was to be granted and in or about the month of March 1908 you gave notice under Section 14 of Ordinance 18 of 1900 that the matter was referred back to the Land Court to decide what compensation should be paid to the claimants and we therefore applied to the Land Court to add the names of the Purchasers as claimants who were requested to forward a written statement of the particulars of our clients' claim.

9. We also on behalf of the Purchasers on the 31st of July 1908 formally called upon His Excellency the Governor of the Colony to grant to our clients a title to the Land which our clients agreed to purchase.

10. The Government then proceeded to pass Ordinance No.15 of 1908 which enabled the Government to appeal from the decision of the Land Court and having passed the Ordinance they appealed and upset the decision of the Land Court in the Vendor's favour.

11. We therefore think that our clients the Purchasers are under all the circumstances of the case entitled to have a fair and reasonable compensation allowed to them for the money they have spent and trouble they have taken in the matter. It must be granted that

OUR

Edit History

2026-06-01 20:41:29 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
35 chase money and the balance should be paid when a Lease was rooted or a Certificate of title issued defining the exact boundaries of the ground and accordingly the Purchasers, believing (as was the case) that the Vendor had shown acquired the absolute title to 200ft by 850ft of ground and desiring that completion should be delayed until the boundaries were fixed and a Government Lease or Certificate granted, paid over to the Vendor $3,500 on account of purchase money and incurred very considerable costs in the preparation of plans and legal expenses. On the 14th July 1902 a letter was addressed by the Colonial Secretary to Messrs. Deacon & Hastings the then Solicitors for the Vendor (copy enclosed) stating that the Crown Lease to the area would be issued in due course and on the 1st of September 1908 another letter was written enclosing a tracing of the area which the Government was prepared to lease. Objections were made to some of the conditions under which the Lease was to be granted and in or about the month of March 1908 you gave notice under Section 14 of Ordinance 18 of 1900 that the matter was referred back to the Land Court to decide what compensation should be paid to the claimants and we therefore applied to the Land Court to add the names of the Purchasers as claimants who were requested to forward a written statement of the particulars of our clients' claim. 9. We also on behalf of the Purchasers on the 31st of July 1908 formally called upon His Excellency the Governor of the Colony to grant to our clients a title to the Land which our clients agreed to purchase. 10. The Government then proceeded to pass Ordinance No.15 of 1908 which enabled the Government to appeal from the decision of the Land Court and having passed the Ordinance they appealed and upset the decision of the Land Court in the Vendor's favour. 11. We therefore think that our clients the Purchasers are under all the circumstances of the case entitled to have a fair and reasonable compensation allowed to them for the money they have spent and trouble they have taken in the matter. It must be granted that OUR
Baseline (Original)
35 chase money and the balance should bcosid when a Lease was rooted or a Certificate of title issued defining the exact boundaries of the ground and accordingly the Purchasers, believing (as was the case) that the Vendor had shon acquired the absolute title to 2001t 850 now of around an: desiring that comple-ion should be jalavri until the boundaries were fixed and a Government Lease or Cervi- fioabe graibad, bald over to the Teador $3,500 on account of pa?- chese nonsy and incurred very considerable costs in the orecacasion of plans and legal exonses. On was 14th, July 1902 a loner was alivessed by the Colo- nial Seccabary to Vesses. Deacon & Hastings the then Solicitors for the Vendor (copy enclosed) stating that the Crown Lease to the area would be issued in due course and on the 1st. of September 1908 another letter was weiben enclosing a tracing of bng area whion bhe Government was prepared to lease. Objections were made to sons of the conditions under which the Lesse was to be granted and in or about the coath of March 1908 vou save notice under Section 14 of Ordinance 18 of 1900 that the gather was referred back to the bann Court to lagiie what compensation should be paid to the claldent and we therefore applied to the Geni Court so add the 1900s of the Purchasers as clairadis 901 wo were cranested to forward a written statement of the particulars of our climes' clai.. 9. We also on behalf of the Parchasers on the Blst, of July 1908 formally callsi apon His Bxcellency the Governor of tas Colony to grant to our clions a title to the Land which our clisaba agreed to purchase. 30. The Government then proceeded to oess on Ordinance No.15 of 1908 which auabled the Government to appeal from the decision of the band Court and having cassel the Oriinance they acpealed an up- get the decision of the Land Court in the Venior's favour. 11. We therefore think that our clients the Purchasers are under all the circungsanoss of the case entitlel to nava a fair adi reasonable compensation call to than for the money they have apot and trouble they have baken in the naveer. It must be granted that OUR Į
2026-06-01 20:41:29 · Baseline
View content

35

chase money and the balance should bcosid when a Lease was rooted

or a Certificate of title issued defining the exact boundaries of

the ground and accordingly the Purchasers, believing (as was the

case) that the Vendor had shon acquired the absolute title to 2001t

850 now of around an: desiring that comple-ion should be jalavri

until the boundaries were fixed and a Government Lease or Cervi-

fioabe graibad, bald over to the Teador $3,500 on account of pa?-

chese nonsy and incurred very considerable costs in the orecacasion

of plans and legal exonses.

On was 14th, July 1902 a loner was alivessed by the Colo-

nial Seccabary to Vesses. Deacon & Hastings the then Solicitors for

the Vendor (copy enclosed) stating that the Crown Lease to the area

would be issued in due course and on the 1st. of September 1908

another letter was weiben enclosing a tracing of bng area whion bhe

Government was prepared to lease. Objections were made to sons of

the conditions under which the Lesse was to be granted and in or

about the coath of March 1908 vou save notice under Section 14 of

Ordinance 18 of 1900 that the gather was referred back to the bann

Court to lagiie what compensation should be paid to the claldent

and we therefore applied to the Geni Court so add the 1900s of the

Purchasers as clairadis 901 wo were cranested to forward a written

statement of the particulars of our climes' clai..

9. We also on behalf of the Parchasers on the Blst, of

July 1908 formally callsi apon His Bxcellency the Governor of tas

Colony to grant to our clions a title to the Land which our clisaba

agreed to purchase.

30. The Government then proceeded to oess on Ordinance No.15

of 1908 which auabled the Government to appeal from the decision of

the band Court and having cassel the Oriinance they acpealed an up-

get the decision of the Land Court in the Venior's favour.

11. We therefore think that our clients the Purchasers are

under all the circungsanoss of the case entitlel to nava a fair adi

reasonable compensation call to than for the money they have apot

and trouble they have baken in the naveer. It must be granted that

OUR

Į

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.